Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomás Senart <ts(at)perfloop(dot)ai>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap
Date: 2026-10-10 01:16:27
Message-ID: CANWCAZZaX3CMcxSRM1FmDM5=ew=2LeivLY6BZt1TLefdvKZC6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 8:35 PM Tomás Senart <ts(at)perfloop(dot)ai> wrote:
> The v34 Index Prefetching patch [2] changes the same loop but still passes
> one TID per bitmap call. We have not tested the changes together.

I'm interested in the ideas in this thread, but I'm thinking I'll wait
to see how the amgetbatch effort shakes out first.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-10-10 01:19:37 Re: docs: Table 9.46. UUID Extraction Functions
Previous Message Richard Guo 2026-10-10 00:52:43 Re: [PG19] Wrong results from NOT NULL-based expression simplification