Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-01-22 08:18:03
Message-ID: CANWCAZYYS9U_kHkAXF_B7UxezkcgFDFdOTgTV9F2r-FL016AGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> For the next version patch, I'll work on this idea and try to clean up
> locking stuff both in tidstore and radix tree. Or if you're already
> working on some of them, please let me know. I'll review it.

Okay go ahead, sounds good. I plan to look at the tests since they
haven't been looked at in a while.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-22 08:38:13 Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly
Previous Message jian he 2024-01-22 08:10:37 Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types