Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>
Cc: Yuya Watari <watari(dot)yuya(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Lepikhov Andrei <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date: 2023-11-18 02:45:51
Message-ID: CANWCAZYC4GbDGzNfBCPJU0x5wfWBtwRzgL4ksC4tfXTwhEjV1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:04 AM Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> All diff files have already been added to v21-0002-Introduce-indexes-for-RestrictInfo patch.

Unfortunately, the patch tester is too smart for its own good, and
will try to apply .diff files as well. Since
bug_related_to_atomic_function.diff is first in the alphabet, it comes
first, which is the reason for the current CI failure.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-11-18 02:54:45 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-11-18 01:54:43 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication