From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: branch-free tuplesort partitioning |
Date: | 2024-11-26 00:50:45 |
Message-ID: | CANWCAZY8PgBtZ7OOuooxq-qwJ5PcdoOs3hRHHR0mZt+JNDaX+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:20 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> I suggest using a test program for this that Tom wrote nearly 20 years
> ago to validate changes that were made to the Bentley & McIlroy qsort,
> available from here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18732.1142967137@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> It generates most of the standardized inputs described by the B&M
> paper. For example, it will generate "Sawtooth" inputs. (Though I
> don't see "organ pipe" input -- that one was a more adversarial case,
> described by their paper, which might also be interesting.)
Thanks for that reference, that will be useful!
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-11-26 01:10:07 | Re: Reordering DISTINCT keys to match input path's pathkeys |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-26 00:49:04 | Re: Use more CppAsString2() in pg_amcheck.c |