Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code
Date: 2026-02-23 10:38:01
Message-ID: CANWCAZY-0zLfpf_J9Yy1fPOrQ6t7iQ_hr+Ca2Bc5AEDajfBqww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 4:23 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 08:49:32AM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > In short, I'm in favor of v14, along with the comment about newer
> > compilers from v15.
>
> WFM. Here's what I have staged for commit.

+1 -- my only nitpick is "Since pg_popcount() uses a function
pointer..." is really "may use".

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boris Mironov 2026-02-23 10:41:19 Re: Idea to enhance pgbench by more modes to generate data (multi-TXNs, UNNEST, COPY BINARY)
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2026-02-23 10:26:46 Re: Row pattern recognition