Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()
Date: 2015-12-10 19:25:51
Message-ID: CANP8+jLwiGw+1ueGiBR0=pjiGkHcN_ktqRPB9QCk4PuPUAkf7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 December 2015 at 18:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
Why did we make the change? I'm not sure it's bad, but

> it seems funny to whack a user-visible behavior around like this
> without a clearly-explained reason.
>

Surely the title of the post explains?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-12-10 19:27:01 Re: Error with index on unlogged table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-10 19:11:50 Re: Patch: ResourceOwner optimization for tables with many partitions