Re: Add support for printing/reading MergeAction nodes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support for printing/reading MergeAction nodes
Date: 2018-04-04 16:57:39
Message-ID: CANP8+jLb4T9PzBAWmVf7g8Fiv5J9-CbfEhZVVocF33GTpJGXzw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 April 2018 at 17:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> BTW, poking around in the grammar, I notice that MergeStmt did not
> get added to RuleActionStmt. That seems like a rather serious
> omission.

MERGE isn't a privilege, a trigger action or a policy action. Why
would it be in RuleActionStmt?

Could you explain what command you think should be supported?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-04 17:03:30 pgsql: Foreign keys on partitioned tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-04 16:56:23 Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables