Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date: 2018-02-01 00:10:19
Message-ID: CANP8+jLYoA0O35gVNUd65WMxwm6NaPuVUB8BEiqo+=pqFzV+iA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 January 2018 at 09:54, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:

> (new version attached)

Why this comment?

Current implementation of projection optimization has to calculate
index expression twice
in case of hit (value of index expression is not changed) and three
times if values are different.

Old + New for check = 2
plus calculate again in index = 3
?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-02-01 00:30:17 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-01 00:06:00 Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions