From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |
Date: | 2017-07-07 11:47:20 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jLRtpp-C0gtxO2HZ+53PKtUAfFgRwKD8f4uEycKMU2mTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 July 2017 at 08:54, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 07:40:55PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> On 07/07/17 13:29, Amit Langote wrote:
>> >Someone complained about this awhile back [1]. And then it came up again
>> >[2], where Noah appeared to take a stance that partitions should be
>> >visible in views / output of commands that list "tables".
>> >
>> >Although I too tend to prefer not filling up the \d output space by
>> >listing partitions (pg_class.relispartition = true relations), there
>> >wasn't perhaps enough push for creating a patch for that. If some
>> >committer is willing to consider such a patch, I can make one.
>>
>> Yeah, me too (clearly). However if the consensus is that all these partition
>> tables *must* be shown in \d output, then I'd be happy if they were
>> identified as such rather than just 'table' (e.g 'partition table').
>
> +1.
+1 to remove partitions from \d display
With 1000 partitions that would just be annoying
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-07-07 12:09:12 | Re: Fix header comment of streamutil.c |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-07-07 11:45:15 | Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench |