From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
Date: | 2018-04-02 06:39:57 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jLMet1MHkYP2no9Wrn5RCiCJvFsF+ie-YUDk2nfXCnjRw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 1 April 2018 at 21:01, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> ***************
>> *** 111,116 **** CREATE PUBLICATION <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable>
>> --- 111,121 ----
>> and so the default value for this option is
>> <literal>'insert, update, delete'</literal>.
>> </para>
>> + <para>
>> + <command>TRUNCATE</command> is treated as a form of
>> + <command>DELETE</command> for the purpose of deciding whether
>> + to publish, or not.
>> + </para>
>> </listitem>
>> </varlistentry>
>> </variablelist>
>
> Why is this a good idea?
TRUNCATE removes rows, just as DELETE does, so anybody that wants to
publish the removal of rows will be interested in this.
This avoids unnecessary overcomplication of the existing interface.
>> + * Write a WAL record to allow this set of actions to be logically decoded.
>> + * We could optimize this away when !RelationIsLogicallyLogged(rel)
>> + * but that doesn't save much space or time.
>
> What you're saying isn't that you're not logging anything, but that
> you're allocating the header regardless? Because this certainly sounds
> like you unconditionally log a WAL record.
It says that, yes, my idea - as explained.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steven Lembark | 2018-04-02 16:58:33 | Re: Please suggest the best suited unit test frame work for postgresql database. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-01 20:01:07 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2018-04-02 06:45:06 | Re: json(b)_to_tsvector with numeric values |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-04-02 06:28:58 | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |