| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: kqueue |
| Date: | 2016-09-13 15:36:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jLHowKRNrP9CL-g_FtrFOkavuzeo_ha7ZnNQxi=T1a5eA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 September 2016 at 08:08, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> So, if I've understood correctly, the purpose of this patch is to improve
> performance on a multi-CPU system, which has the kqueue() function. Most
> notably, FreeBSD?
I'm getting a little fried from "self-documenting" patches, from
multiple sources.
I think we should make it a firm requirement to explain what a patch
is actually about, with extra points for including with it a test that
allows us to validate that. We don't have enough committer time to
waste on such things.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-13 15:50:07 | Re: kqueue |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-13 15:32:54 | Re: kqueue |