| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Date: | 2016-08-26 11:31:49 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jLFtRWihDa50Ud-X8ZTcEhXCHEkqF3=sU5zqiKWhOyrnw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 August 2016 at 04:39, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am relaunching $subject as 10 development will begin soon. As far as
> I know, there is agreement that we can do something here. Among the
> different proposals I have found:
> - pg_clog renamed to pg_commit_status, pg_xact or pg_commit
> - pg_xlog renamed to pg_xjournal, pg_wal or pg_journal
Don't mean to be a party pooper, but what discussion and agreement are
we referring to here?
If we are going to suggest doing something we really should summarize
the reason for doing it rather than assume it is self evident, cos it
certainly isn't.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-08-26 11:49:18 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-08-26 10:48:09 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |