Re: chained transactions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: chained transactions
Date: 2018-03-05 09:21:33
Message-ID: CANP8+jLDje=KLh_R7_Nv=_=18sWyNAGOLFLiXMZC1zcDAdTzJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2 March 2018 at 07:18, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-02-28 22:35:52 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> This feature is meant to help manage transaction isolation in
>> procedures.
>
> This is a major new feature, submitted the evening before the last CF
> for v11 starts. Therefore I think it should just be moved to the next
> fest, it doesn't seems realistic to attempt to get this into v11.

Looks like a useful patch that adds fairly minor syntax that follows
the SQL Standard.

It introduces no new internal infrastructure, so I can't call this a
major feature.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2018-03-05 09:42:27 Re: GSOC 2018 ideas
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2018-03-05 09:04:02 Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables