| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |
| Date: | 2017-09-07 18:13:24 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jLB=yM2LrhcugO7887ZAWK=HRW89CKKt5CMOZacZOzGRw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 September 2017 at 10:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I don't want to go there, and was thinking we should expand the new
>>> comment in DefineSavepoint to explain why not.
>
>> Okay.
>
> Does anyone want to do further review on this patch? If so, I'll
> set the CF entry back to "Needs Review".
OK, I'll review Michael's patch (and confirm my patch is dead)
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-09-07 18:23:26 | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-07 18:07:04 | Re: [bug fix] Savepoint-related statements terminates connection |