| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
| Date: | 2016-04-04 05:18:47 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jL4f2y1-U4PXBp4LrNz6aYmPZ_m2LnKzzgdeTOFA1PjWw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 April 2016 at 01:14, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd say why not.
>
I'd say "why not wait?". Minor, non-urgent patches will definitely go
nowhere for a long time, so it gains nobody to submit now.
Submitting patches during freeze has been discouraged for many years, so
asking a long term contributor to avoid sending multiple minor patches is
in line with that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-04-04 05:52:12 | Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key() |
| Previous Message | Igal @ Lucee.org | 2016-04-04 04:49:42 | Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key() |