From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Undo logs |
Date: | 2018-05-28 11:40:50 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jL=KGODyCnKqp5rceLJHkJ+Mksc0+qhjibKivLAnswwcA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 May 2018 at 23:22, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> As announced elsewhere[1][2][3], at EnterpriseDB we are working on a
> proposal to add in-place updates with undo logs to PostgreSQL. The
> goal is to improve performance and resource usage by recycling space
> better.
Cool
> The lowest level piece of this work is a physical undo log manager,
> 1. Efficient appending of new undo data from many concurrent
> backends. Like logs.
> 2. Efficient discarding of old undo data that isn't needed anymore.
> Like queues.
> 3. Efficient buffered random reading of undo data. Like relations.
Like an SLRU?
> [4] https://github.com/EnterpriseDB/zheap/tree/undo-log-storage/src/backend/access/undo
> [5] https://github.com/EnterpriseDB/zheap/tree/undo-log-storage/src/backend/storage/smgr
I think there are quite a few design decisions there that need to be
discussed, so lets crack on and discuss them please.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2018-05-28 14:19:25 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
Previous Message | Yuriy Zhuravlev | 2018-05-28 10:00:03 | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |