Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2017-03-24 14:12:27
Message-ID: CANP8+jKUFDP58e893snRuhV9K+cO+5SAB87VYbBp2W4eeTP==g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 March 2017 at 13:08, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:

Results look good for me. Idea of committing both of patches looks
> attractive.
>

I'll commit mine since I understand what it does. I'll look at the other
one also, but won't commit yet.

> We have pretty much acceleration for read-only case and small acceleration
> for read-write case.
> I'll run benchmark on 72-cores machine as well.
>

No need to wait for that.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-03-24 14:18:09 Re: Adding the optional clause 'AS' in CREATE TRIGGER
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2017-03-24 14:11:22 Re: pg_serial early wraparound