Re: Simplifying the interface of UpdateMinRecoveryPoint

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying the interface of UpdateMinRecoveryPoint
Date: 2016-07-13 13:31:34
Message-ID: CANP8+jKS+C6kuGm0TmtHv0z-oyxLBjpD-OMTrtGeW_FG0v7=ZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 July 2016 at 23:49, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hence why not simplifying its interface and remove the force flag?

Is this change needed as part of a feature? If not, I see no reason for
change.

If we all work towards meaningful features the code can be cleaned up as we
go.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-07-13 13:59:12 Re: BUG #14247: COMMENT is restored on wrong database
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-13 13:25:08 Re: Simplifying the interface of UpdateMinRecoveryPoint