| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Huehner <stefan(at)huehner(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |
| Date: | 2016-05-07 08:21:51 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jKPPRxrXot97ym7X4HK2GYoy8o0_FEiTDfFMxXwq5LAig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 May 2016 at 16:10, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> While this in itself is about a two-line fix, after reviewing
>> 137805f89acb3611 I'm pretty unhappy that it got committed at all.
>> I think this obvious bug is a good sign that it wasn't ready.
>> Other unfinished aspects like invention of an undocumented GUC
>> don't leave a good impression either.
>>
>
> The GUC is meant to make testing during development easier. I haven't
> realized it got committed, but I assume Simon plans to remove it before the
> final release.
Yes, the GUC was for testing, as mentioned on the commit message.
> Can't check right now with Simon, though, as he's is out of office this
> week.
>
Am back and reading.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-05-07 08:45:10 | Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-05-07 07:50:26 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock downgrades have broken pg_upgrade |