Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Date: 2015-05-15 10:04:40
Message-ID: CANP8+jKJFimw3frmX2ewfyNC0SHssKaKgpOTt5_c5dmOCxQmeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new feature
> of value to FDWs. This is just drive-by breakage.
>

I think that comment is reasonable. I will continue with my commits of
tablesample, then return to see if we can improve/revert the API breakage.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-05-15 10:14:40 Re: pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-05-15 09:56:24 Re: pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension