Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots
Date: 2018-06-09 13:00:36
Message-ID: CANP8+jK750fY83oeVrp1EngF=W=9r_f8hoftC2LVUqx+2koe6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 June 2018 at 19:03, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>> It seems to have affected Greg.
>
> As far as I can tell Greg was just theorizing?

I'll wait for Greg to say whether this was an actual case that needs
to be fixed or not. If not, happy to revert.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-09 13:10:11 Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-09 12:36:01 Re: Compromised postgresql instances