Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode
Date: 2018-06-11 10:05:53
Message-ID: CANP8+jJzUzyC8_-ospWW3d+GWhqJx6P9ALnZ4+FR511ejCsQWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 June 2018 at 14:45, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:

> Currently _bt_search() always locks leaf buffer in shared mode (aka BT_READ),
> while caller can relock it later. However, I don't see what prevents
> _bt_search()
> from locking leaf immediately in exclusive mode (aka BT_WRITE) when required.
> When traversing downlink from non-leaf page of level 1 (lowest level of non-leaf
> pages just prior to leaf pages), we know that next page is going to be leaf. In
> this case, we can immediately lock next page in exclusive mode if required.
> For sure, it might happen that we didn't manage to exclusively lock leaf in this
> way when _bt_getroot() points us to leaf page. But this case could be handled
> in _bt_search() by relock. Please, find implementation of this approach in the
> attached patch.

It's a good idea. How does it perform with many duplicate entries?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-06-11 10:35:29 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-06-11 09:59:26 Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key