Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE

On 2 April 2018 at 19:30, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>>> ***************
>>> *** 111,116 **** CREATE PUBLICATION <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable>
>>> --- 111,121 ----
>>> and so the default value for this option is
>>> <literal>'insert, update, delete'</literal>.
>>> </para>
>>> + <para>
>>> + <command>TRUNCATE</command> is treated as a form of
>>> + <command>DELETE</command> for the purpose of deciding whether
>>> + to publish, or not.
>>> + </para>
>>> </listitem>
>>> </varlistentry>
>>> </variablelist>
>>
>> Why is this a good idea?
>
> I think it seemed like a good idea at the time, so to speak, but several
> people have argued against it, so we should probably change this in the
> final version.

Who has argued against it?

I see that Andres has asked twice about it and been answered twice,
but expressed no opinion.
Petr has said he thinks that's right.
Nobody else has commented.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services