Re: Letting the client choose the protocol to use during a SASL exchange

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Letting the client choose the protocol to use during a SASL exchange
Date: 2017-04-06 22:29:42
Message-ID: CANP8+jJs49kTNVGd+EaQWC0Fry25F=xD2+hhqVwAAqpQctDDuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 April 2017 at 16:15, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com> wrote:

> Per the SCRAM RFC, it is the server who advertises and the client who picks.

Yes, but what does the RFC say about how to handle servers with an pg_hba.conf?

How and what will we advertise?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-06 22:31:03 Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-06 22:13:16 Re: Letting the client choose the protocol to use during a SASL exchange