From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Minor typo in partition.c |
Date: | 2017-04-15 11:39:43 |
Message-ID: | CANP8+jJpTBgf9XuD9GY1_v7NHDisH9fNrZDFBh3s9yraHX2ZOQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 April 2017 at 09:18, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Where shall I mention BRIN in that chapter?
>
> Maybe just append a new <sect2> right below where <sect2
> id="ddl-partitioning-constraint-exclusion"> ends?
>
> I had included both BRIN and UNION ALL views under a sub-section titled
> "Alternative Methods" in my original patch (March 3rd one), but removed
> the whole sub-section per review comments. Perhaps, my patch didn't do a
> good enough job of describing either BRIN or UNION ALL views, that it
> ended up being not convincing enough to be made part of the section.
>
> By the way, will you also be adding details on UNION ALL views (I remember
> you said you would along with BRIN)? Actually, my patch copied verbatim
> what older docs had about them that you said is too short a description.
It makes sense to describe all similar techniques in one section of the docs.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-04-15 13:29:53 | Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-04-15 11:38:23 | Re: Minor typo in partition.c |