Re: WAL consistency check facility

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date: 2016-08-24 08:44:45
Message-ID: CANP8+jJhgReqG-jM5fPd69bmmwRp9LJEo6fZuga5YHH=FhV62w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 August 2016 at 16:56, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 22 August 2016 at 13:44, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Please let me know your thoughts on this.
>
> Do the regression tests pass with this option enabled?

Hi,

I'd like to be a reviewer on this. Please can you add this onto the CF
app so we can track the review?

Please supply details of the testing and test coverage.

Thanks

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-08-24 08:54:32 Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-08-24 08:25:46 Re: postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidating prepare statement execution plan.