Re: Does people favor to have matrix data type?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does people favor to have matrix data type?
Date: 2016-05-25 07:38:58
Message-ID: CANP8+jJZ250COgdWjS7HJU3J5d8kgR_RB0aDrBmLiRMvp5x+ng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 May 2016 at 03:52, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:

> In a few days, I'm working for a data type that represents matrix in
> mathematical area. Does people favor to have this data type in the core,
> not only my extension?
>

If we understood the use case, it might help understand whether to include
it or not.

Multi-dimensionality of arrays isn't always useful, so this could be good.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-05-25 08:30:41 Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-05-25 07:11:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Windows service is not starting so there’s message in log: FATAL: "could not create shared memory segment “Global/PostgreSQL.851401618”: Permission denied”