Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Xin Zhang <xzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Asim Praveen <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication
Date: 2017-11-22 17:57:22
Message-ID: CANP8+jJQi9tYKorNAbq7exYpT8duxy1-k6Q6ZYgvKC6_14XDAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 November 2017 at 10:07, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/
>>
>> Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as
>> committed but don't see the change in latest master ?
>
> Good thing you double-checked. This has been marked as committed
> eleven day ago by Simon (added in CC), but no commit has happened. I
> am switching back the status as "ready for committer".

The patch has been applied - look at the code. Marking back to committed.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-22 18:01:22 Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-22 17:34:36 Re: [PATCH] using arc4random for strong randomness matters.