| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-02-19 20:39:30 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJOrCZ5KYGGRyp0yuzFZMTck+tWAtkiFdg=Bc6TUedBaw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 February 2017 at 15:46, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It leaves me asking what else is missing.
>
> There is certainly a lot of room for improvement here but I don't
> understand your persistent negativity about what's been done thus far.
> I think it's pretty clearly a huge step forward, and I think Amit
> deserves a ton of credit for making it happen. The improvements in
> bulk loading performance alone are stupendous. You apparently have
> the idea that somebody could have written an even larger patch that
> solved even more problems at once, but this was already a really big
> patch, and IMHO quite a good one.
Please explain these personal comments against me.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-19 21:20:28 | Re: drop support for Python 2.3 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-02-19 20:31:40 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |