Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2017-01-04 21:20:20
Message-ID: CANP8+jJGRpczm8L=LQCzuiEG3qHbY1cQB+T4A-cct7xgFmjj9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31 December 2016 at 08:36, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Here is resubmission of patch to implement logical decoding of two-phase transactions (instead of treating them
> as usual transaction when commit) [1] I’ve slightly polished things and used test_decoding output plugin as client.

Sounds good.

> General idea quite simple here:
>
> * Write gid along with commit/prepare records in case of 2pc

GID is now variable sized. You seem to have added this to every
commit, not just 2PC

> * Add several routines to decode prepare records in the same way as it already happens in logical decoding.
>
> I’ve also added explicit LOCK statement in test_decoding regression suit to check that it doesn’t break thing.

Please explain that in comments in the patch.

> If
> somebody can create scenario that will block decoding because of existing dummy backend lock that will be great
> help. Right now all my tests passing (including TAP tests to check recovery of twophase tx in case of failures from
> adjacent mail thread).
>
> If we will agree about current approach than I’m ready to add this stuff to proposed in-core logical replication.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/EE7452CA-3C39-4A0E-97EC-17A414972884%40postgrespro.ru

We'll need some measurements about additional WAL space or mem usage
from these approaches. Thanks.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-04 21:23:12 Re: [sqlsmith] Crash reading pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-04 21:17:10 Re: generating fmgr prototypes automatically