Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvaro(dot)herrera(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)
Date: 2017-03-22 18:08:55
Message-ID: CANP8+jJ3vq_12=Nx-Kz8v5CJvUgv=Ocm34fs3BL-Oz+XBO3Gyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 March 2017 at 17:41, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> + if (TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(xid))
> + status = gettext_noop("in progress");
> + else if (TransactionIdDidCommit(xid))
> + status = gettext_noop("committed");
> + else if (TransactionIdDidAbort(xid))
> + status = gettext_noop("aborted");
> + else
> +
> + /*
> + * can't test TransactionIdIsInProgress here or we race with
> + * concurrent commit/abort. There's no point anyway, since it
> + * might then commit/abort just after we check.
> + */
> + status = gettext_noop("in progress");
>
> I am not sure this is going to do the right thing for transactions
> that are aborted by a crash without managing to write an abort record.

Yes, perhaps we should report that state as "aborted - incomplete".

And of course, we might return "subcommitted" also, which could
technically also be an abort in some cases, so we'd need to do a wait
loop on that.

Which makes me think it would be confusing to say "in progress" for
when it is our current xid, since the user might wait until it is
complete and then wait forever. Prefer it if it said "in progress -
current transaction"

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-22 18:09:13 Re: [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-22 18:05:03 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size