| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Failover Slots |
| Date: | 2016-04-06 09:43:23 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+tAHaAtVTxwHtpjEV9gjk+M8CAQFyOPo_=Y5pQ+fEzxA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 January 2016 at 14:25, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd like to get failover slots in place for 9.6 since the're fairly
> self-contained and meet an immediate need: allowing replication using slots
> (physical or logical) to follow a failover event.
>
I'm a bit confused about this now.
We seem to have timeline following, yet no failover slot. How do we now
follow a failover event?
There are many and varied users of logical decoding now and a fix is
critically important for 9.6.
Do all decoding plugins need to write their own support code??
Please explain how we cope without this, so if a problem remains we can fix
by the freeze.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stas Kelvich | 2016-04-06 09:47:18 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-06 09:35:14 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |