Re: Allow interrupts on waiting standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow interrupts on waiting standby
Date: 2017-01-27 11:32:40
Message-ID: CANP8+j+q7GrDFs7XgaLCwNCZGfWHxSJB9SbjJUf9K0vTcNuNRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 January 2017 at 20:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 26 January 2017 at 19:20, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>> > I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
>> > for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch.
>>
>> I have waited, so not sure what you mean. Tomorrow is too late.
>>
>> Replacing with a latch wouldn't be backpatchable, IMHO.
>
> Hmm, you pushed this to the master branch as commit e8ee3d6b859a, but I
> see no backpatch.

There appeared to be a complaint at my speed, so I slowed down.

On reading that there are no objections to this being backpatched, I
will do that now.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-01-27 11:45:04 Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-01-27 11:31:27 Re: BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues with combined queries