| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM |
| Date: | 2018-01-08 15:44:11 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+aJr9o1i_RbNcVwXxU6y5pncpyfGG-CbAwwdAFU7tMiw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 4 January 2018 at 21:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM
>
> Buildfarm doesn't like this one bit.
Can't we automate these messages? Seems strange to send manual emails
every time. We do know who the commits are coming from and we have
their email address.
It would be useful to get automatic message giving a summary of
buildfarm results at 15, 30 and 60 minute intervals, even if it is
just ALL CLEAR.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-08 16:01:53 | Buildfarm status monitoring (was Re: pgsql: Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-08 13:14:11 | Re: pgsql: Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-08 15:58:13 | Re: Parallel append plan instability/randomness |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-08 15:43:00 | Re: Invalid pg_upgrade error message during live check |