Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-04-06 09:26:20
Message-ID: CANP8+j+RndoRTWZ-7QHhH=MYY-KUaZkw9KxrWMdLF-Ku6Od=Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 April 2016 at 09:23, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Okay, I pushed the patch!
> Many thanks to all involved in the development of this feature!
>

Very good.

I think the description in the commit message that we don't support "quorum
commit" is sufficient to cover my concerns about what others might expect
from this feature. Could we add similar wording to the docs?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-04-06 09:28:55 Re: large regression for parallel COPY
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-06 09:18:08 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2