| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL procedures |
| Date: | 2017-10-31 17:44:45 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+j+8c5wN8k-RLDgh1vWr-FT_HubO6rU5w6fdJV2WjyQ=cA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 31 October 2017 at 18:23, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been working on SQL procedures. (Some might call them "stored
> procedures", but I'm not aware of any procedures that are not stored, so
> that's not a term that I'm using here.)
I guess that the DO command might have a variant to allow you to
execute a procedure that isn't stored?
Not suggesting you implement that, just thinking about why/when the
"stored" word would be appropriate.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-10-31 17:47:06 | Re: Re: Anyone have experience benchmarking very high effective_io_concurrency on NVME's? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-31 17:42:41 | Re: Fix dumping pre-10 DBs by pg_dump10 if table "name" exists |