Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io
Subject: Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster
Date: 2018-07-26 07:06:45
Message-ID: CANP8+j+1q9W6bLE0LuofHdUxS-sN9LfJFb0UMwtM9CJD47uzUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 July 2018 at 03:30, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> The v3 version of the patch also fixes the very small performance
> regression for the (probably quite likely) worst-case situation. New
> performance is about 3.5% faster instead of 0.5-1% slower. So likely
> there's no longer any need to consider this.

Works for me!

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleksandr Shulgin 2018-07-26 07:32:47 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-07-26 06:12:04 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation