Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:01 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 02:58:43AM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> > Currently, a lot of our utility scripts (anything that uses
> > connectDatabase) don't support service=name params or PGSERVICE=name env
> > vars, which is really too bad. I previously thought that this was because
> > of a lack of interest, but perhaps people do want it?
>
> I'm all for more test coverage, FWIW.
>
> Torsten, the patch has been waiting on input from you based on my
> latest review for some time, so I have marked it as returned with
> feedback in the CP app. Feel free to resubmit a new version if you
> are planning to work on that.

TO: Torsten,
CC: Micael and other hackers

If you can't work for ther patch for a while because you are busy or
other some reason,
I can become additinal reviewer and apply review comments from Micael
to the patch instead of you.

If you don't want my action, please reply and notice me that. If
possible, within a week :)

Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your
contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost.

TO: Mecael and other hackers,

There are any problem in light of community customs?

---
Great regards,
Ryo Kanbayashi