From: | Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option |
Date: | 2023-02-16 04:38:01 |
Message-ID: | CANNMO+Kwb4_87G8qDeN+Vk1B1vX3HvgoGW+13fJ-b6rj7qbAww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:31 AM Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I suggest we call it "xmlformat", which is an established term for this.
>
Some very-very old, rusted memory told me that there was something in
standard – and indeed, it seems it described an optional Feature X069,
“XMLSerialize: INDENT” for XMLSERIALIZE. So probably pretty-printing should
go there, to XMLSERIALIZE, to follow the standard?
Oracle also has an option for it in XMLSERIALIZE, although in a slightly
different form, with ability to specify the number of spaces for
indentation
https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/functions268.htm#SQLRF06231.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2023-02-16 04:39:22 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2023-02-16 04:36:16 | Re: some namespace.c refactoring |