Re: Stabilize and shorten test_checksums/013_rewind test

From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Stabilize and shorten test_checksums/013_rewind test
Date: 2026-09-23 10:15:47
Message-ID: CAN55FZ3Nj3FQYdF1MC33ciaqupRyO2OF0vgD0i1Pc51jRQmKxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, 22 Sept 2026 at 00:38, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Shouldn't 021 get the same fix (0001)? That's only executed with
> checksum_extended so its not that visible on CI, but it has the same
> issue.

Yes, you are right. I realized that we can do the same thing for all
test_checksum tests, so I applied similar change to all of the related
checksum tests in 0001.

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Avoid-idle-WAL-waits-in-checksum-tests.patch text/x-patch 9.5 KB
v3-0002-Fix-WAL-file-selection-in-013_rewind-test.patch text/x-patch 2.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2026-09-23 10:21:03 Re: [PG19][PATCH] Make postgres_fdw statistics import atomic
Previous Message Denis Smirnov 2026-09-23 10:07:55 Re: Fold NOT IN / <> ALL expressions containing NULL to FALSE