From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options |
Date: | 2023-03-22 10:16:54 |
Message-ID: | CAN55FZ2eJAB=teBnFCj_fx6Rjx_wnc44XBp1Z2poQEqQ-rU0mw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 11:12, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 14.03.23 15:07, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> >> I think the uuid side of this is making this way too complicated. I'm
> >> content leaving this as a manual option for now.
> >>
> >> There is much more value in making the ssl option work automatically.
> >> So I would welcome a patch that just makes -Dssl=auto work smoothly,
> >> perhaps using the "trick" that Andres described.
> > I tried to implement what we did for ssl to uuid as well, do you have
> > any comments?
>
> For the uuid option, we have three different choices. What should be
> the search order and why?
Docs [1] say that: OSSP uuid library is not well maintained, and is
becoming increasingly difficult to port to newer platforms; so we can
put 'uuid-ossp' to the end. Between 'uuid-e2fs' and 'uuid-bsd', I
believe 'uuid-e2fs' is used more often than 'uuid-bsd'.
Hence, they can be ordered as 'uuid-e2fs', 'uuid-bsd', 'uuid-ossp'.
Does that make sense?
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2023-03-22 10:17:17 | Re: About a recently-added permission-related error message |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2023-03-22 10:14:19 | Re: Issue attaching a table to a partitioned table with an auto-referenced foreign key |