Re: make -C src/test/isolation failure in index-killtuples due to btree_gist

Hi,

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 03:42, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:24:55AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Well, it tests multiple index types, not just gist. I guess
> > test/modules/indexes/ or so should work? Not sure about plural or not.
>
> test/modules/index/ would work here. If you feel strongly about being
> able to do an EXTRA_INSTALL in src/test/isolation/, I have no
> objections to that as that would also solve the original problem if
> that's the consensus. My personal choice would be a test module for
> that, as it feels cleaner.

I have two patches to implement this: one moving the killtuples test
under test/modules/index/, and another adding coverage for the
recovery path.

0001 moves killtuples test under the test/modules/index/ without any
implementation change.

0002 converts the killtuples isolation test to a TAP test to exercise
the recovery path. This patch sets up a standby and additionally
re-inserts into the table while testing the GiST index to ensure
coverage of the gistRedoDeleteRecord() function.

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft