Re: Custom oauth validator options

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
To: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, myon(at)debian(dot)org
Subject: Re: Custom oauth validator options
Date: 2025-12-17 09:35:51
Message-ID: CAN4CZFP_2fe2-18wUoXDZodV8suVe9o++pv=hP8KxxvWkmCx7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Overall, +1 that this limitation is real and worth discussing.I’ll plan to send a patch shortly exploring option (b).

Personally I would go with either (a) or (c), and I was planning to
clean up / improve / share my (c) patch as a second attempt for this
thread, if it didn't receive any replies. I can still do that, so that
we have multiple test implementations. (b) seemed a not as nice design
to me, but maybe you find a better way to implement it than I did.

Also now I really like the idea of the PGC_HBA, if there's a way for
users to configure it without depending on line numbers or other
easy-to-change details.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2025-12-17 09:44:04 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2025-12-17 09:33:51 Re: Custom oauth validator options