Re: Assert in test_bms_membership();

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ilya Cherdakov <i(dot)cherdakov(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assert in test_bms_membership();
Date: 2026-09-08 19:32:31
Message-ID: CAN4CZFPYov+qUqjATawADRLwEy6XZGLo89um8UsBWNiBKSf_iA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello!

This seem to be 0002 from a patchset I submitted yesterday[1].

> Perhaps a stupid question, but: Who cares?

My reasoning for this was that the other test module that has the same
issue (test_extensible) states that it is an example for extension
developers:

This module can be used as a template for developers willing to develop
their own extensions. "Writing a Custom Scan Provider" covers the
documentation for custom scans.

So I thought a small fix is a good improvement there, and then
test_bms_membership was an easy follow up because it's the same thing.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAN4CZFOTQXMZvuPxweO4Fm7%2BsjrPJUqU-JvYKETLBxuhqgbPjw%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidar Imamov 2026-09-08 19:37:01 meson: pass OpenSSL/ICU include dirs to extensions
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-09-08 19:08:33 Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) fails when table owner lacks CONNECT