| From: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [oauth] Split and extend PGOAUTHDEBUG |
| Date: | 2026-04-01 09:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAN4CZFPNL4xuNAwmD1-TUR-z+C84axb+cdhip26k3YBFYo9r1g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> To keep the brainstorming going, I chose the following for v3, but
> they're by no means settled: ...
The names look good. I'm still not 100% sure about plugin-errors, but
since we already have debug in the variable name, it might be okay.
+/* all safe and unsafe flags, for the legacy UNSAFE behavior */
+#define OAUTHDEBUG_UNSAFE_ALL ((uint32) ~0)
The name of this variable is a bit confusing, it's not only about
unsafe settings. I understand why you added the unsafe to it, but
before checking the value/comment I thought this will be the bitmask
of all unsafe options. On the other hand I don't have a better idea
other than simply using ALL.
+oauth_get_debug_flags(void)
+{
+ uint32 flags = 0;
+ const char *env = getenv("PGOAUTHDEBUG");
...
One of the reasons why I implemented this in a C file is because I
wanted to avoid reparsing and warning spam/duplication. Reparsing
shouldn't be a major issue since this is a debug feature, but this
approach causes a warning to print twice in a few corner cases.
That's probably acceptable, the issue is limited in the current code,
but I wanted to mention it as a limitation, as I don't think there's a
good way to fix this without a .c file.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-04-01 09:38:15 | Re: [PATCH] Fix minRecoveryPoint not advanced past checkpoint in CreateRestartPoint |
| Previous Message | cca5507 | 2026-04-01 09:27:13 | Re: tuple radix sort |