| From: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: scary patch contest |
| Date: | 2026-08-28 08:35:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAN4CZFOgpN48-7D6qGY_=3g2_O8KvwbdJnpaJJK+8OSYHEvcSQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 28 Aug 2026, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Interestingly, although the current SOTA model can do good things
> without complicated prompts, it still seems useful for complicated
> tasks. Here's a prompt that I plan to give Sol a try.
I'm running something very similar with Fable, also focusing on the
prioritization / restartability as it eats up usage limits quickly. It
already ran ~30% of the planned first-round checks, and reported 22
issues with reproducers so far. Running it with another model seems
like a good idea, most likely while they will have common discoveries,
some of the findings will be different.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-08-28 09:04:43 | Re: scary patch contest |
| Previous Message | Ewan Young | 2026-08-28 08:29:57 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) fails when replica identity index is dropped |