| From: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: REPACK: warn about skipping foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2026-08-31 23:18:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAN4CZFNz5LFsYGo7zMDLxC+odFt4Oe2sxu9_o5PGs2=TqcLCdA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2026, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> I don't object to the new warning, however this does not look like REPACK
> regression. AFAICS, CLUSTER in v18 behaves in the same way.
You are right, I also should have mentioned CLUSTER in the subject.
The reason I focused on REPACK is that the release notes mention it as
a replacement of VACUUM FULL, which does emit this warning.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-08-31 23:31:42 | Re: Offline data checksum changes can cause incorrect checksum state on standbys |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2026-08-31 23:10:33 | Re: Reducing relcache memory usage: deduping index shapes |