On Fri, 06 Nov 2026, Iwata, Aya <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> In that case, I believe this should be handled as a core
> feature rather than left to an extension.
Yes, I agree that this part is questionable, but to me this still
looks like the safest choice:
1. it can already be the case in other scenarios, so this is not
really new behavior
2. can the core for sure make the assumption that the bgworker will
want to reconnect to the same database again?