Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation

From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
Date: 2026-03-31 23:30:32
Message-ID: CAN4CZFM4mPKawnAsTyPafMnSzunvw8d4Aw0wLQ9qVAtYwpRejg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

v3 looks good to me

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2026-03-31 23:38:26 Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2026-03-31 23:23:11 Re: pg_publication_tables: return NULL attnames when no column list is specified