Re: WIP - xmlvalidate implementation from TODO list

From: Marcos Magueta <maguetamarcos(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP - xmlvalidate implementation from TODO list
Date: 2026-02-22 05:11:18
Message-ID: CAN3aFCfkrkOJ+R39x=9qvXMGLE3yuL9fZdNyRa5V=BAdGGu=-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Unfortunately, the patch no longer applies.[1]
Trying to understand why it doesn't, we can get back to that.

> My concern was that leaving it entirely open to any user could lead to
> unwanted CPU or memory usage. Perhaps the other reviewers have a
> different opinion on this.

That's a fair concern. Is there even an alternative aside from predefined
roles?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-02-22 06:19:29 Re: DOCS - Add an "Options" section for pg_controldata
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-02-22 03:50:12 Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary filename